# PIP-27: Limits & Token whitelist for V1

**URL:** <https://forum.pantherprotocol.io/t/pip-27-limits-token-whitelist-for-v1/495>\
**Category:** Panther Improvement Proposals (PIPs)\
**Created:** [September 8, 2025, 10:08am UTC](https://forum.pantherprotocol.io/t/pip-27-limits-token-whitelist-for-v1/495 "2025-09-08T10:08:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ToXiC\_eHC](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex036/user_avatar/forum.pantherprotocol.io/toxic_ehc/32/291_2.png) [@ToXiC\_eHC](https://forum.pantherprotocol.io/u/ToXiC_eHC)\
**Post date:** [September 8, 2025, 12:44pm UTC](https://forum.pantherprotocol.io/t/pip-27-limits-token-whitelist-for-v1/495/4 "2025-09-08T12:44:56Z")

</div>

Hello Towel.

V1 DAO Zone would only only accept people who have passed the PUREFI KYC/AML checks.

This would be in reference to my earlier announcement that we should do this here:

> [@\[Proposal\] Launching a DAO-Operated Zone — With KYC, Compliance, and Community Safety in Mind](https://forum.pantherprotocol.io/t/proposal-launching-a-dao-operated-zone-with-kyc-compliance-and-community-safety-in-mind/453):
>
> Hi everyone, As many of you know, I’ve been discussing this initiative with several members in private over the past weeks. It’s time we bring this conversation to the wider forum: I’d like to formally propose that we move forward with launching a DAO-operated zone. The key motivations behind this are simple: white_check_mark Give the DAO direct control over a space we can shape according to our values. white_check_mark Ensure it’s compliant — this includes implementing KYC (with reason…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.pantherprotocol.io/t/pip-27-limits-token-whitelist-for-v1/495)._