This is a great start of the flow diagram!
The community should indeed think about splitting Discourse moderators and Snapshot authors I would say, for decentralization purposes as suggested above.
Moderators should review the formal PIP(s) and provide an in-depth PIP Analysis Report. The purpose of a PIP Analysis Report is to ensure that all:
- Costs
- Steps to implement
- Legal considerations
- Third-party review requirements
- Potential conflicts of interests
- Any further implications have been properly considered and identified in order to ensure the DAO members have enough information to make an informed decision.
As @Mikhail12 suggested, the community could discuss a small ZKP reward for reviewing PIP drafts.
To give everyone a better idea, a PIP template consists of the following:
Proposal Name:
(Title of the proposal)
Author:
(List the author of the proposal; can be a real name, TG, Twitter or Discord handle)
Summary:
(summary of the proposal in 2-3 sentences)
Motivation:
(Provide the motivation for and background info about the proposal and why it is necessary)
Rationale:
(Outline the benefits that implementation of the proposal will bring)
Proposed Actions:
(Provide the tasks that need to be executed to achieve the goal of the PIP and related details, and who will be involved in the implementation of the PIP and their responsibilities)
Timeline:
(Insert key dates and milestones)
Budget:
(Provide detailed costs of implementation and where the funds will come from)
Voting and Participation:
(Provide the ways in which community members can vote on this PIP - yes/no - and outline the steps that need to be taken for the PIP to get approved, including when PIP will begin, how long voting will be open, and other details)
We can see a similar proposal structure at Apecoin.