Thanks, I really like what you are doing here and I am looking forward to the expansion of your flow diagram.
Eventually the flow diagram can be put up to vote once you @Hodlerboi have drafted up the entire Governance flow diagram as @ToXiC_eHC suggested. Once the flow diagram is implemented we could see a more transparent Goverance flow.
We have assesed initiatives like this when we set up the Panther forum last year. Initiatives like POAP and TCP for example. We came to the conclusion that these were not feasible due to technical (integration) reasons on Discourse. Furthermore, we want to facilitate a certain level of privacy on the Panther forum.
Governance discussion take time. Best would imho be to draft up after few weeks of discussion. Discussing step for step makes sense.
My concern is how do we provide anonymity while ensuring that the general public is not pushing discussions and initiatives?
That’s indeed a valid point. A few things on that regard:
I agree. The community is relatively small but sufficient to set up proposals. I am a private sale investor and I do not really want to be doxed for security reasons.
Eventually the proposal will be put up to vote and is needed for exchange listings and ecosystem updates.
Thanks but that was not my question? - I was asking about anonymity and public participation in discussions and pushing of topics… The exchange discussion and ecosystem updates is something else.
@Joris - I guess what you are saying is - anyone can discuss and push topics etc - but at the end of the day it is the ZKP holders who has to cast their votes to approve and proposals?
Yes indeed & hence why a moderator review process is so important as well as Panther’s DAO rules and values. The community could for example set out a few DAO rules here in order to protect the protocol from harmful proposals.
Would it be possible to arrange a discord voice channel to discuss ideas?
We can make notes of what was discussed and add it to the thread.
I think this would benefit the pace and flow of ideas.
In future Mods could arrange this with the community.
Starting to make sense yes
Yes next step is snap shot? Most discussion for this proposal will be discourse i think
I think we should hear and give privileges to those people who participated in the first DAO, attracting the zkp prize as a passport to confirm their credentials, but for those who want to participate in this, we should not abandon these people or compare them with those who come now
Great idea! Can the community please select a few individuals? Not only a few Council members but also 2 new Discourse moderators. These should be different indivuals than the current Snapshot authors and admins. I would suggest to make a new topic for this, which has to be put onto the proposal draft as a reference point.
Since the Snapshot authors and admins already got voted in through PIP-8, the community could discuss the Panther’s DAO values and PVL role until the final proposal draft is set up.
Done:
Hi, Im new here. What’s up guys?
Welcome!
As you can see from the above, we are deep into this conversation.
If you would like to add anything, please do so.
We have covered the basic layout of what the Framework should look like
At next step snapshot we should have 2 different proposal type, technical and not technical. Mexc is not technical, should be different in flow diagram since team does need to code on non technical proposal.
Non-technical Panther Improvement Proposals could for example be called Panther Ecosystem Proposals instead.
That said, Panther’s DAO values still have to be discussed here as eventually as pointed out above as these should be displayed on the Governance Framework proposal. Please think of a few points that the Panther DAO should stand for. These should be aligned with what we are trying to build, deploy and govern here. Basically the mission, vision and purpose of Panther Protocol which should be upheld during the creation of PIPs and/or PEPs.