Should we reduce the 72hour voting period for future PIP's?

[ToXiC_eHC]

Currently it is set to 72hours and it runs even though quorum is reached.

It has been suggested that we should change this in the future after PIP-9, any thoughts on this matter?

PIP-6 did not pass! Allow foundation to vote?

Thanks for your question(s) above about the 3 days voting period. Do voting periods need to be a 3 day minimum? Right now, yes. Does the voting period has to stay this way? No, but then this has to be decided by the DAO as well. Hence a Discourse discussion, PIP from the Community, ZKP voted in etc. The voting period can be determinated on Snapshot. If the community wants to change the voting period, I suggest to propose this after PIP-9 since within a very short timeframe there will be 3 PIP’s…

[Marcus]

No I don’t think we should. Yes, it is annoying with the current proposals as we all agree on them and it feels like time wasted.

However, we should be mindful of proposals which may be controversial, malicious or require more time for people to do a deeper dive into what is being proposed. For these reasons, I think 3 days is already quite short

[M-M]

If we reach the quorum, the voting process should end. Providing flexibility while voting simultaneously.

[DanP]

If a quorum is reached with a majority of the votes for a proposal, I see no need for the voting to continue, as consensus will have been achieved and can’t be overthrown with the opposite vote?

[Zilius]

true, if the quorum is reached, then there is no point in waiting for the end, it should be considered fulfilled by a majority of votes

[M-M]

I agree, with your argument.

[M-M]

Those who have been here since the public sale, should be granted an augmented weighting power during any voting process. In order to avoid any Whale in the future to jeopardise ZKP future.

[Akin]

Wouldnt it be good see the results at the end of the voting period not during the voting period? Something like real world election systems.

[M-M]

30 hours, can be an efficient compromise.

[ToXiC_eHC]

I think we should take note that it took us until the 3rd day to get the final votes in… So perhaps in some instances reducing the hours may not be the best option - unless the quorum requirement is also changed.

[Zilius]

closing the vote on reaching a quorum is a sober decision, I think, since the consensus is considered to have been reached.

[Tik]

Agree on this argument.

[Zilius]

I agree that we still have a lot of proposals to adopt, on this, I think we should complete the quorum vote.

[ToXiC_eHC]

Based on recent votes we can combine multiple items into a single PIP also.

[Zilius]

great idea, I support it, it will speed up the bureaucratic process

[Wisdom]

Closing the vote when quorum is reached will be good but not to reduce the voting hour. So it gives time for awareness and participations